It’s bad times for those in the corn ethanol business.
Hat tip to Martin Tobias for the link to the story followed from his blog (see the blogroll, bottom right).
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=azPOyrCia8Nc&refer=exclusive
For a visual reference point on why corn ethanol is a bad idea from an energy standpoint, consider the following:
The two images below represent the land area required to produce biomass feedstock required to produce a quantity of fuels equal to 100% of the output of the ICF synfuels plant (which will achieve a dramatically lower GHG footprint and cost of production than corn ethanol).
The image on the top in yellow is if the output were achieved with corn ethanol. The image on the bottom is if a cellulosic bioenergy crop called Miscanthus was used (this feedstock IS compatible with our process).
CORN
MISCANTHUS
Taking this much corn out of the food chain removes an amount of food adequate to meet the basic annual calorie requirements of 29,000,000 people…
We are also completely ignoring the energy balance issues here, so if one took into account the energy burned in the growing process (and therefore how much actual energy profit was available for the rest of the economy to use), corn would look very dramatically worse.
Of course, since we will use coal and waste biomass, not an agriculturally sourced feedstock, we will produce the same output, with no impact at all on land use and food production…
NRDC? Sierra Club? Bueller?


